Why we suck
I figured it out, thanks to all this bike racing silliness. The reason why our society here in the US is seen as having no culture, or American's being soft. All depending on who you are speaking with as to which comment applies.
Maybe just very probably it's that we see something done as it's perhaps supposed to be done and we say "Awesome job!".
Mediocrity = Awesome?
Adequate = Superior?
Are you farging kidding me?
Are you going to stand there and tell me that a task done as it is expected to be done is above average, it's great, or it's awesome? If that's the case what were we originally aiming for? Marginally better than failure?
I guess if you have low expectations you will not often be disappointed. But what type of existence is that? What's the point? How does this fill the question of "why are we here". If you are living for mediocrity, you are basically just taking up space, air, and natural resource.
On top of it, this post stems from a thread on a bike racing forum. Yeah, bike racing! A sport where athletes drop thousands of dollars on coaches, equipment, and many other things to help them be a better athlete.
So let me get this straight. You spend $5,000 on a super light carbon bike, then another $1,500 on a fast, light, and super trick set of wheels, $1,200 a year on coaching, and lastly huge amounts of training time all so you can race better at an event that barely meets the minimum expectation of getting the race started on time and results posted correctly and in a timely manner? Does nothing to make you at least feel good about your efforts that day? I mean, you win a hard race and what you get after is to go up to a card table under a 10 x 10 tent and pick up a $0.98 tee shirt and $20.00.
And then you criticize those that say, hey, this could be done a lot better, and with very little effort the quality could be improved substantially?
I don't get this attitude, it is a duality that does not make sense. These two behaviors are diametrically opposed.
This is why we suck. We accept this mediocre, barely adequate performance as "awesome".
How the hell do you improve on "awesome"?
Shouldn't the description of "awesome" be reserved for only the very best, cream of the crop, practically unachievable accomplishments?
There is a great line in the cartoon movie "The Incredibles". "I'll sell my inventions so that *everyone* can have powers. *Everyone* can be Super! And when everyone's Super... no one will be."